INTRODUCTION:

The early twentieth-century market economies focused on rapidly increasing gross domestic product. Their growth models led to significant growth in human, social, and economic well-being. However, carbon fuel industrialization has resulted in economic growth with problems like growing international inequality, financial market crisis, decline in biodiversity, global warming, and climate change. The impact of industrialization on society and ecology is unsustainable (UN 2019)¹. Environmental issues, radically altering the climate and ecology of the planet, were not given due attention and were ignored as a mere ‘externality’ of progress till the mid-twentieth century. However, the persistent impact of greenhouse gas emissions, depletion of biological resources, and climate change in the last fifty years was too significant. In the seventies, it was universally accepted that the global ecosystem is finite, and economic growth was making development ‘unsustainable’. This realization led to a debate on alternative strategies for economic growth without degrading the environment. It broadened the view of development to ‘Sustainable Development’ (SD). Sustainable Development “meets the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs” (Brundtland Commission, 1987)². The objective was to develop an economic development model to eliminate the trade-offs between economic growth and sustainability. The Brundtland Commission argued, “The environment is where we live; development is what we all do in attempting to improve our lot within that abode. The two are inseparable” (ibid.)³.

The primary goal of SD is living sustainably off Earth’s natural resources and promoting well-being for everyone without degrading the Earth’s life-support systems. Nations should sustain the ecology, the life support system, and the community through the economic, social, and environmental protection pillars of SD.

The Rio+ 2012 report ‘The Future We Want’ stated that eradicating poverty and malnutrition, changing the pattern of consumption and production, and sustaining the environment are “overarching objectives of, and essential requirements for, sustainable development.”⁴

The report called for action on SD in global development policies. The focus shifted to developing new SDGs by reconciling development with environmental protection and sustainable resource management (OECD, 2013)⁵. The UN General Assembly adopted the SDGs in 2015, stating, “We are committed to achieving sustainable development in its three dimensions – economic, social, and environmental”⁶. The 17 Sustainable SDGs were designed to achieve the 2030 Agenda objective, i.e., ‘leave no one behind’ (ibid.)⁷.

The historical continuity of Indigenous communities across the globe reveals that while the nations struggled to balance rapid growth with a minimum negative impact on the environment, the tribal/local communities, with informal livelihood practices and community-centric and often unscientific/ethno-scientific cultural traditions, have been living ‘sustainably.’ They have successfully sustained the fragile ecosystem. The indigenous populations have survived across generations and have livelihood systems and diverse indigenous knowledge systems (IKS) rooted in their practices of adaptation to the environment. Their indigenous knowledge has been critical for their survival, has enhanced their resilience, and has enabled them to mitigate and adapt to the climate.

This raises an argument that SD is not a new concept. Sustainability and practices for SD are deeply interwoven in the IKS. Nations forgot them or decided to ignore the significance of ‘sustainability’ in the race to become ‘developed’ and started to make the Earth ‘unsustainable’. This paper explores the various perceptions of IKS and their role in sustainable development. It traces ideas similar to the targets outlined in the SDGs in the IKS, particularly in the Indian IKS.

OBJECTIVES:

This paper explores IKSs, focusing mainly on Indian IKS, to gain insight into the harmonious relationship of indigenous communities and ecology and to illustrate that ‘sustainability’ is a part of India’s cultural legacy.

This study aims –

· To understand the theory of sustainable development and the SDGs adopted in Agenda 2030;

· To explain ‘Indigenous knowledge’ and its link with sustainability;

· To trace the roots of the SDGs in Indian IKS by presenting brief insights into different traditions and techniques of the sustainable livelihood of Indigenous communities.

METHODOLOGY:

This paper explores how the Indian IKS achieved sustainability across generations. A review of research papers and studies, particularly those focusing on Indian communities, has been presented to map their traditions and socio-economic practices and show how they are linked with SDGs. This search encompasses available research published up to 2023 and is restricted to open-access, peer-reviewed journal articles. This study adopts a review approach to assess indigenous knowledge linked to various SDGs.

Section 1 of the research paper introduces the theme, Section 2 briefly reviews the literature, and Section 3 delves into the meaning and importance of IKS. Section 4 attempts to illustrate that ‘sustainability’ is ingrained in India’s IKS.

REVIEW OF LITERATURE:

SD became an integral part of the global policy agenda on environmental, economic, and social challenges with the ‘Millennium Development Goals’ in 2000, which were to be achieved by 2015. The 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) were adopted in 2015 to address poverty, health, education, inequality, climate action, and environmental conservation. Sustainable development literature emphasizes the need for socially inclusive policies that address disparities in wealth, resources, and opportunities. According to Sachs, J. D. (2012)⁸, the SDGs, built on the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs), represent comprehensive and inclusive objectives for environmental sustainability. SDGs provide a universal framework, though regional differences in development and resources have led to critiques around goal feasibility and measurement (ibid). Van Zanten et al. (2018)⁹emphasize the importance of localizing SDGs to ensure relevance and feasibility across diverse contexts. Local governments and communities play an essential role in adapting goals to meet local needs while fostering community ownership and participation, which is crucial for long-term impact.

As the world is struggling to combat global warming and is looking for appropriate climate action methods, sustainable living practices can be traced in indigenous populations and their knowledge of the land, natural resources and wildlife management, biodiversity and environmental conservation, health, and education (Agrawal, 1995)¹⁰ Indigenous knowledge is being acknowledged. Countries are adopting a bottom-up perspective of utilizing IKS for sustainability. M. Gadgil et al. (1993)¹¹ define IKS as practices for sustainable resource management, such as controlled burning, rotational harvesting, and habitat restoration. Scholars highlight that tribal communities have been “guardians of biodiversity,” maintaining about 80% of global biodiversity in their territories. Parajuli and Das (2013)¹² illustrate that these communities have conserved the biodiversity of natural resources in their efforts to survive and have built a rich ecological IK in this process. Indigenous perspectives emphasize sustainable resource use, resilience, and community-driven development, challenging conventional development models and promoting environmental justice (Whyte, 2017)¹³. Indigenous communities adapt to ecological challenges and have developed a practical and dynamic IKS through experiential learning. The contributions of IK are reflected in their ability to conserve biodiversity, sustainably harvest, and utilize natural resources in varying geographical and climate regimes. The complex and dynamic IKS has developed a pliability to face environmental challenges. India’s IKS, through diverse livelihoods, sustainable agricultural practices, and water management, can contribute significantly towards achieving SDGs (Negi, V.S., Pathak, R., Thakur, S. et al. 2023)¹⁴. Senapati Nayak and Rasika Lonkar (2024)¹⁵ examine the critical role of IKS in India’s environmental sustainability and emphasize incorporating it into the mainstream policies of preventing climate change and environmental degradation. They state that more than 700 indigenous communities, i.e., approximately 8% of India’s population, possess knowledge and practices which has preserved the cultural and ecological diversity of the country. Their study presents multiple examples of India’s IKS. India’s NITI Aayog has taken steps to localize the SDGs and has aligned national programs with the SDG framework. The Aayog’s SDG India Index assesses states and Union Territories on SDG indicators, promoting competition and accountability. This index has encouraged state governments to adopt tailored policies that address regional development priorities (Niti Ayog)¹⁶.

Indigenous Communities and Indigenous Knowledge Systems:

Even though there is no international definition of ‘Indigenous peoples’, several views prevail. The ILO Indigenous and Tribal Peoples Convention, 1989 (No. 169)¹⁷ defines ‘Indigenous peoples’ as, ‘peoples whose social, cultural and economic conditions distinguish them from other sections of the national community, and whose status is regulated wholly or partially by their customs or traditions”. Martínez Cobo¹⁸, in his UN 1983 study presented a working definition of Indigenous communities as “peoples and nations are those which, having a historical continuity with pre-invasion and pre-colonial societies that developed on their territories, consider themselves distinct from other sectors of the societies” and said that these communities are “determined to preserve, develop and transmit to future generations their ancestral territories, and their ethnic identity.”

Thus, the term ‘indigenous people’ have a historical continuity, are closely linked to their geographical territory and natural resources, have a distinct social, and economic system, culture and beliefs, and above all their sovereignty and resilience has enabled them to preserve and transmit their knowledge and traditions systems or the IKS as a historical and cultural heritage (Bansal, Sanchita et al.)¹⁹. This heritage is the backbone of these people. The term ‘indigenous’ has many synonyms - tribes, aboriginals, ethnic groups, Adivasi, nomads, etc.

The ecological practices of local people, their oral traditions, kinship, communal connection, etc., are used for the judicious utilization of natural resources. The World Bank (2003)²⁰ defines IK as “a large set of knowledge, skills, and experiences developed outside the formal educational system” applied to develop, improve, and sustain livelihoods. In its report, ‘Indigenous Knowledge for Development’²¹, the World Bank argues that local empowerment, development, and self-sufficiency of the Indigenous communities are significant in sustainable development.

IK is deeply rooted in a society, particularly the rural poor who use this knowledge in decision-making, agriculture, animal husbandry, education, health, and natural resource management (Sharma, 2014)²².

IK is socially constructed, and it matures over generations through traditions and the cultural heritage of indigenous or local communities. Often, IK is orally passed down for generations through stories, folklore, rituals, songs, and customs. Since IK has evolved through generations, it is creative, practical, and dynamic. Dependence on local natural resources for existence, farming, water management, education, and health, using limited local resources, minimal capital, and labour-intensive techniques, has led to localized adaptive innovations in indigenous societies, making IKS unique and sustainable.

Indigenous Knowledge Systems and Sustainable Development:

The IKS has a unique epistemology and scientific validity deeply rooted in local ecology. IKS can preserve global biodiversity and build resilience to climate change and sustainable development. World Conservation Strategy of the International Union and Conservation of Natural Resources in 1980, Brundtland Commission, World Commission on Environment and Development, 1987, and United Nations Conference on Environment and Education in 1992, recognized the relevance of the concept of IKS in achieving environmental sustainability.

Indigenous knowledge helps in sustainable development because it adapts modern technology to the local needs, preserves local knowledge, uses local skills, and emphasizes the management of natural resources. Self-governance, self-sufficiency, collective welfare, and equity are the core values of all indigenous communities. Central to IKS is the concept of well-being that emphasizes harmony between man and nature, “sufficient food, strong family and community values of caring, reciprocity, and solidarity, freedom to express identity and to practice one’s culture” (UNPFII, 2010), ²³. Traditional knowledge can be a major asset in achieving SDGs (UN 2012, ²⁴. UNDP (2023)²⁵ calls the Indigenous people ‘Custodians of the Earth's most essential ecosystems’ as their traditional methods of agriculture, forestry, and animal husbandry ‘hold the key to keeping our planet within safe planetary boundaries.’ The community-based management of natural resources, respect for nature, and practices for the conservation of resources are an integral part of the indigenous ideas of livelihood and reflect the sustainable production and consumption practices of SDG ²⁶.

Indian Indigenous Knowledge Systems and the Concept of Sustainability:

The demographic diversity in India is visible in multiple ethnic groups with distinctive cultural backgrounds, religious institutions, and social structures. With approximately 744 tribal communities and ethnic groups, India is a storehouse of IKSs. 70% of the Indian population, particularly the tribes, is closely dependent on the local environment and natural resources for their livelihood. This reliance has established a harmonic co-existence with nature. Each ethnic group has inherited its unique indigenous knowledge across generations through customs, traditions, literature, and sustainable livelihood practices. The tribal societies, marginalized groups, and rural poor have a rich and diverse IK of farming, food preservation, animal husbandry, land use patterns, water management, herbal medicine and health practices, environmental conservation, and weather prediction.

Girayasthe parvathaa himavantho-ranyam the prithivi syonamasthu

Babhrum Krishnam Rohiniim vishvaruupaam dhruvaam bhuumim prithiviim indraguptaam ajiitho-ahatho akshathodhyasthaam prithiviimaham

O Prithivi, may thy hills, snow-clad mountains, and forests be propitious to us. On this earth, which is brown (earth), black (water), and red (fruits and flowers), which has many appearances and is firm, and is protected by Indra, I have settled, unconquered, unslain, and undiminished. Prithvi Sukta 11, Rig Veda ²⁷(The Speaking Tree)

The rich tapestry of Indian IKS exists in the Vedas and Upanishads, Vastu Shastra, Ayurveda, Yoga and Tantra, Jyotish, and folk traditions. The Vedic philosophy regarded nature and the environment and honoured it. The Prithvi sukta of the Atharvaveda, a Vedic hymn to the Earth, praises land as the mother of the entire biosphere. The Prithvi Sukta worships Mother Earth, describing it as a living entity and emphasizing our duty to sustain it. Prithvi Sukta also calls upon all to respect their mother, Land/Environment, as the one who conceives, feeds, protects, and makes her progeny independent. It is in these Vedic scriptures that the roots of sustainability can be traced. The Vedas broadly deal with the environment, ecology, and cosmos, on the one hand, and on the other, they explore the relationship between them and humanity. The Vedas warn that if humanity defiles the five elements of nature- Earth, Water, Fire, Wind, and Space- it will catastrophically damage the very existence, survival, and growth.

Indian IK For Sustainable Economy and Livelihood (SDG 1, 2, 3, 8. 9, and 12):

Subsistence livelihoods in Indigenous communities— sustainable agriculture, animal husbandry, hunting, fishing, medicinal plants, and traditional handicrafts, dependent on local natural resources- generate income to meet personal and household needs, provide food security, provide employment, and develop resilience against climate disasters. Sustainable livelihood practices are ingrained in Indian local traditions like organic farming, handicrafts, handloom weaving, and small-scale cottage industries, and provide rural employment and cater to all needs of the local population. (SDG1, SDG2) Mollica Dastider (2020)²⁸ highlights the traditional practices of jhoom cultivation and the ceremonies of worshipping the gods of forests, mountains, lakes, and rivers of the Lepcha Adivasi in the East Himalayas and argues that the scientific rationality of their IK has sustained the primeval East Himalayan ecosystem. Comprehensive study on indigenous knowledge of Indian states like wool dyeing in Bhotiya tribal community in the Garhwal Himalayas²⁹, cultivation techniques of small and marginal farmers³⁰used to increase productivity e.g. mixed cropping of potato, chilies, turmeric etc., grain storage practices (e.g. use of neem as a pesticide), traditional methods of prediction of heavy rain, use of green manure, knowledge of treatment of domestic animals using local herbs, and numerous simple methods of dealing with common illness. Dasgupta et al. (2021)³¹ discussed the potential of sustainable management of shifting cultivation or Jhum cultivation to balance food production and biodiversity conservation and ensure the future sustainability of tropical forests adopted by Nagaland, Tripura, and northeastern states.

Similarly, the Tangkhul Naga community in the northeastern region of India has adapted its agricultural practices to the physiography of its region and its climate by using shifting cultivation in steep-slope areas and terrace cultivation in areas with gentle slopes. With this technique, they have developed climate-resistant crop varieties to fulfil their food requirements (IWGIA and SDC, 2012) ³².

According to UNPFII (2010), the fundamental conditions of ‘well-being’ are food, strong family and values of care, and harmony in a safe and non-polluted environment. SDG 3 aims to reduce mortality rates, end epidemics, and reduce the frequency of tuberculosis, malaria, and other diseases. India’s IKS concept of living well – a harmonious relationship between nature and the notion of equality – had the same vision. It is voiced in the Upanishads as, “Sarve Bhavantu Sukhinah Sarve Santu Niraamayaah”, i.e., “May all be happy and May all be healthy and free from illness”. The IK has enabled generations to survive.

Ayurveda is a heritage of holistic IK for health through natural remedies, diet, and lifestyle practices. Yoga promotes physical well-being and mental health. The traditional Indian diet system is suitable for dealing with malnutrition and overall health outcomes. Community health practices like langar (i.e., community kitchens and prasad in temples) foster community well-being and resilience. Bhushan Patwardhan (2009)³³ highlights the importance of India’s comprehensive healthcare approach, stating that Ayurveda’s logic, theoretical foundations, and epistemology of the six Darsana, mainly the Samkhya and Nyaya-Vaishesika systems of natural philosophy, make it a holistic, inclusive knowledge system. Therefore, it is necessary to maintain its identity and integrity.

The IKS shows that traditional informal occupations enable sustainable resource management. A diverse range of non-farm activities like food processing, weaving, handloom weaving, dying and printing, and handicrafts of Indigenous communities across India reflect the same idea as is voiced in SDG 9. For instance, weaving is women's main occupation in the Tangkhul Naga community of northeast India. Handloom or khadi fabric has been used by Indians across generations. Natural food preservation techniques such as sun drying, pickle making, and storage of grains in indigenous structures, the use of ‘gobar’ to make fertilizer, and the use of biopesticides are an integral part of a rural economy.

Indian IK For Equity and Inclusion (SDG 4, 5, 10):

Indigenous knowledge systems prioritize equity and inclusion, harmony in decision-making, and ensuring that women and marginalized groups also participate in and have access to justice (SDGs 4 and 5). The local governance system of Indian villages, i.e., Panchayati Raj, encourages local self-governance at the grassroots level. The indigenous education system fosters lifelong learning. An insight into India’s Gurukul traditions reveals that India provided quality education during the Vedic period. Gurukul's education system emphasizes holistic development, personalized instruction, and a close mentor-disciple relationship between the ‘guru’ and ‘shishya.’ The guru-shishya tradition was sacred in Hinduism (P. Sevalami, 2019), ³⁴ and focused on academic knowledge and cultivating moral, ethical, and spiritual values. Students were trained in traditional arts and crafts, pottery, weaving, and sculpture skills. (SDG 4)

Women were respected as transmitters of traditional knowledge (SDG 5). Studies show that Naga women are the backbone of the community and are responsible for running the household, parenting, and entrepreneurship. In the tribal communities of Araku Valley in Andhra Pradesh, women promote a sustainable livelihood through a balance between family, community, and environment. In tribes such as the Khasi and Garo of North-East India, women have exclusive land rights and inherit ancestral properties.

Indian IK For Environmental and Ecological Sustainability (SDG 6, 7, 13, 14):

Ecological sustainability means adapting human activity to the environment's natural ecosystem to maintain the long-term sustainability of nature. It aims at conserving biodiversity, natural resources, and water resources, and controlling pollution. They have been the guardians of the planet’s biodiversity and have lived in harmony with nature for ages. Their belief in the sacredness of nature and an instilled conservationism in their cultural traditions reflect their knowledge of ecological sustainability, which is being upheld by the SDGs today. A study of the tribal communities in Meghalaya, North-east India, highlights their knowledge of ecology. The concept of ‘sacred groves’, i.e., village-restricted forests and supply forests in Meghalaya, has conserved the forests despite the environmental sensitivity of the region (Bhattacharjee, S. 2023)³⁵. The tribes nurture and conserve the forests/ trees of their habitations, their water sources. The Soligas tribes of the Chamarajanagar district, Karnataka, living around the Biligiri Rangaswamy Temple wildlife sanctuary, depend on the surrounding forests and have an in-depth IK of ‘life on land’ (SDG 15). V. S. Rawat et al. (2007)³⁶ document the Indigenous knowledge of resource management in the subsistence economy of a tribal region in Tons Valley, west central Himalaya. Their research explores how the community utilizes and conserves major species of plants for food, fodder, and medicine with their traditional crop system to manage consumption and production (SDG 12). Most Indigenous communities have unique techniques of water resource management adapted to soil, bedrock, and topography, like nallas, bunds, check dams, wells, and masonry dams (SDG 6). Thus, the concept of sustainability existed long before rainwater harvesting came into fashion.

Indian IK For Climate Change Mitigation and Adaptation (SDG 11, 12, 13):

Sandeep Acharya (2011)³⁷ points out that in the diversity of India's flora and fauna, there are numerous examples of indigenous methods that use bioindicators to predict rainfall and weather changes. Since India is largely an agricultural economy dependent on seasonal rainfall, different local communities have observed the phenological and behavioral activities of plants and animals. For example, the Bhotya tribe in the Indian state of Uttarakhand relies on several indicators to predict weather conditions (Rautela and Karki, 2015)³⁸.

Indigenous knowledge of sustainable energy and resilient infrastructure (SDG 9) is visible in traditional dwellings. In Ladakh, monasteries use solar energy, reducing the use of fossil fuels. Studies show that Indigenous construction practices in Kashmir - the Taq system (timber-laced masonry) and the Dhajji-Dewari system (timber frame with infill walls) are used for earthquake-safe housing (A. A. Khan, 2008)³⁹. Similarly, in the Barmer, Rajasthan district, the local community's families live in houses formed as four to five circular structures in a ‘Dhani’. Constructed from locally available materials, the houses are suitable for the extreme daily temperatures of the Thar desert, and the circular design protects them from strong winds and earthquakes (A. Sharma and M. Joshi 2008)⁴⁰.

Vasudhaiva Kutumbahkam (SDG 16, 17):

India’s understanding and advocacy of world peace are ancient. The concept of Vasudhaiva Kutumbakam in the Vedic scripture Maha Upanishad (Chapter 6, Verse 72): Hitopadesha (1.3.71) teaches that the whole world is one family. Vasudha means the earth, and Kutumbahkam means family, i.e., the earth is just one family.

Similarly, the ‘Shanti Mantra’ evokes harmony and peace with the sky, earth, water, plants and trees, peace of trees, peace of religion, and peace of the universe. SDG16 for promoting peaceful and inclusive societies and justice for all is a reiteration of this philosophy.

Mahatma Gandhi foresaw that the insatiable and unending pursuit of material pleasure and prosperity was a threat to the Planet and its resources long before the word ‘sustainable’ was defined and became an international debate when he said, “There's enough in the world to meet the needs of everyone but there's not enough to meet the greed of everyone”⁴¹. He argued that a sustainable society must work in partnership with nature because “The earth, the air, the land, and the water are not an inheritance from our forefathers but on loan from our children.”⁴²

Challenges in Integrating IKS into Sustainable Development Initiatives:

Today, across the globe, indigenous communities are marginalized and face discrimination. Their knowledge and experience in sustainable development are not fully acknowledged. Usually, the needs of the indigenous peoples are not recognised by the government, and they are excluded from the decision-making processes. The national policies and programs, on one hand, disregard their needs and, on the other, fail to recognise their potential. Their autonomy and rights are violated. This can be particularly seen in the attitude towards traditional medicinal knowledge like Ayurveda in India. Traditional knowledge and oral traditions about ecology, medicine, and sustainable land management practices are often rejected as unscientific due to a lack of validation and are not acknowledged in the mainstream discourse of sustainable development. There is limited institutional support to record and use their knowledge. Their intellectual property rights are not protected, leading to exploitation and unauthorized appropriation of IKS for commercial gain. The migration of the youth of indigenous communities to urban areas and the modernization of their habitat are eroding the IKS and challenging its preservation and transfer to the next generation.

Suggestions for Integrating Indigenous Knowledge Systems with Sustainable Development Policies:

Indigenous and modern scientific knowledge cannot be treated as separate entities if sustainable development goals are to be met. Cooperation and collaboration between Indigenous communities, governments, and organizations for sharing knowledge can be achieved by promoting their participation in decision-making processes. Empowerment of indigenous communities by providing institutional, financial, and technical support must be ensured to integrate IKS into mainstream sustainable development initiatives in agriculture, natural resource management, and climate change. Research projects for preserving, validating, and disseminating indigenous knowledge must be undertaken.

CONCLUSION:

The Indigenous knowledge systems protect the linkage of society with their natural ecosystem. For decades, development models have favoured scientific knowledge over traditional knowledge, and development models have favoured the latter. However, knowledge is rarely acquired in isolation. Indigenous and scientific knowledge cannot and should not be regarded as separate and isolated entities. Indigenous knowledge must be integrated with sustainable development initiatives to solve global concerns inclusively. The critical significance of IK in achieving sustainable development goals has been highlighted in this research paper, along with the challenges it faces and recommendations to promote it. Embracing the richness of indigenous knowledge systems will help in attaining an equitable, resilient, and sustainable future.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST:

The author has no conflicts of interest regarding this investigation.

REFERENCES:

1. United Nations. Independent Group of Scientists appointed by the Secretary-General. Global Sustainable Development Report. 2019: The Future is Now – Science for Achieving Sustainable Development. 2019. United Nations. https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/gsdr2019

2. Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development (WCED). Brundtland Commission Report. 1987. Oxford; Oxford University Press. https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/rio20/futurewewant

3. Ibid.

4. United Nations. Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future, 1987. http://www.un-documents.net/our-common-future.pdf

5. OECD. Putting Green Growth at the Heart of Development, OECD Green Growth Studies, OECD Publishing. 2013. Paris. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264181144-en.

6. United Nations. Transforming our world: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (A/RES/70/1). 2015. https://undocs.org/A/RES/70/1

7. Ibid.

8. Sachs, Jeffrey. From Millennium Development Goals to Sustainable Development Goals. Lancet. 379/9832. Pg no. 2206-2211. 2012. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60685-0.

9. Van Zanten, J. A., and Van Tulder, R. Multinational enterprises and the Sustainable Development Goals: An institutional approach to corporate engagement. Journal of International Business Policy. 1(3–4): 208–233. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1057/s42214-018-0008-x

10. Agrawal, Arun. Indigenous and Scientific Knowledge: Some Critical Comments. Indigenous Knowledge and Development Monitor. 1995.https://www.researchgate.net/publication/246458426

11. Gadgil, M., et al. Indigenous Knowledge for Biodiversity Conservation. Ambio- A Journal of Human Development. 1993; 22(2): 151156. 1993.https://www.researchgate.net/publication/240046204

12. Parajuli, D. R. and Das, T. Indigenous Knowledge and Biodiversity: Interconnectedness for Sustainable Development. International Journal of Scientific and Technology Research. 2013. 2(8): 220-224. https://www.ijstr.org/final-print/aug2013/ Indigenous Knowledge-And-Biodiversity-Interconnectedness -For Sustainable-Development.pdf

13. Whyte, Kyle. What Do Indigenous Knowledges Do for Indigenous Peoples? Keepers of the Green World: Traditional Ecological Knowledge and Sustainability, edited by Melissa K. Nelson and Dan Shilling. 2015: 57-82. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/abs/traditional-ecological-knowledge/what-do-indigenous-knowledges-do-for-indigenous peoples/BA243E368554B110EBB72A63DBAB7FF9

14. Negi, V.S., Pathak, R., Thakur, S. et al. Scoping the Need of Mainstreaming Indigenous Knowledge for Sustainable Use of Bioresources in the Indian Himalayan Region. Environmental Management. 2023; 72: :135–146. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-021-01510-w

15. Nayak, S., and Lonkar, R. Indian Indigenous Knowledge System and Sustainability: A Significant Way to Maintain Sustainability. International Journal of Research Publication and Reviews. 2023; 4(10): 2582-7421. http://www.ijrpr.com

16. Niti Ayog, SDG India Index, Baseline Report, 2018. https://www.niti.gov.in/sites/default/files/201901/SDX_Index_India_21.12.2018_1.pdf

17. ILO. ILO Convention on Indigenous and Tribal Peoples, 1989 (No.169):AManual.2003.http://www.ilo.org/public/english/standards/norm/egalite/itpp/convention/index.htm.

18. Cobo, José R. Martínez Martinez Cobo, Jose, Study of the Problem of Discrimination Against Indigenous Populations: Preliminary Report. UN Doc. E/CN.4/Sub.2/L.566 29 June 1972. https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/768953?ln=enandv=pdf

19. Bansal, Sanchita and Sarker, Tapan and Yadav, Anshita and Garg, Isha and Gupta, Mansi and Sarvaiya, Harsha. Indigenous Communities and Sustainable Development: A Review and Research Agenda. Global Business and Organizational Excellence. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1002/joe.22237

20. World Bank. Implementation of Operational Directive 4.20 on Indigenous Peoples: An Independent Desk Review. Report no. 25332, January 10, 2003. Washington D.C.: Operations Evaluation Department, Country Evaluation and Regional Relations (OEDCR), World Bank. https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/570331468761746572/pdf/multi0page.pdf

21. The World Bank. Indigenous knowledge for development: A Framework for Action. 1998. http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/388381468741607213/Indigenous-knowledge-for-development-a-framework-for-action

22. Sharma, A.K. Indigenous Knowledge Communication in the 21st Century. International Journal of Digital Library Services. 2014; 4(1): 128-135. http://www.ijodls.in/uploads/3/6/0/3/3603729/ajay_kum_sharma_128-135.pdf

23. UNPFII. Ninth session E/C.19/2010/CRP.4 25. The Human Development Framework and Indigenous Peoples, Self-Determined Development with Culture and Identity. 19-30 April, 2010. New York: United States. https://www.un.org/esa/socdev/unpfii/documents/E%20C.19%202010%20CRP.4.doc

24. UN System Task Team on the Post 2015 UN Development Agenda. (2012). Realizing the Future, We Want for All: Report to the Secretary-General. New York: United Nations. https://www.un.org/millenniumgoals/pdf/Post_2015_UNTTreport.pdf

25. UNDP. (8th Aug 2023). What do the Sustainable Development Goals have to do with Indigenous people? https://stories.undp.org/what-do-the-sustainable-development-goals-have-to-do-with-indigenous-people

26. Magni, G. Indigenous knowledge and implications for the sustainable development agenda. Background paper prepared for the 2016 Global Education Monitoring Report, Education for people and planet: Creating sustainable futures for all. UNESCO. 2016. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000382235_eng

27. Rig Veda, Bhu Suktam. https://www.speakingtree.in/blog/pruthvi-suktam-the-earths-importance-as-seen-in-vedic-times

28. Dastider, Mollica. Practices as Political Tribal Citizens and Indigenous Knowledge Practices in the East Himalayas. Special Articles, Economic and Political Weekly, 55(46), pp:49-56. 2020.

29. Kala, and Kala, Chandra Prakash. Indigenous Knowledge of the Bhotiya Tribal Community on Wool Dyeing and its Present Status in the Garhwal Himalayas, India. Current science. 83 (7), pp. 814-817. 2002. https://nopr.niscpr.res.in/bitstream/123456789/19375/1/IJTK%201%281%29%2040-46.pdf

30. Sharma, Avinash and Manpoong, Chowlani and Pandey, Himanshu and Kumar, Chandan and Baja, Yani and Singh, Sanjit and Mounglung, Chitkiya. Practices of Indigenous Agriculture Knowledge of Farmers in India. 2022. DOI:10.20944/preprints 202206.0071.v1

31. Dasgupta, R., Dhyani, S., Basu, M., Kadaverugu, R., Hashimoto, S., Kumar, P., Johnson, B. A., Takahashi, Y., Mitra, B. K., Avtar, R., and Mitra, P. Exploring Indigenous and Local Knowledge and Practices (ILKPs) in Traditional Jhum Cultivation for Localizing Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs): A Case Study from Zunheboto District of Nagaland, India. Environmental Management. 2021; 72(1): 147–159. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-021-01514-6

32. IPP, IWGIA and SDC. (2012). Indigenous Peoples and Climate Change Adaptation in Asia. Asia Indigenous Peoples Pact http://www.iwgia.org/iwgia_files_publications_files/0656_IPs_and_Climate_Change_Adaptation_in_Asi

33. Patwardhan, B. Ayurveda and Integrative Medicine: Riding a Tiger. Journal of Ayurveda and Integrative Medicine. 2009; 1(1): 1-8. https://doi.org/10.4103/0975-9476.59820

34. Selvamani, P. Gurukul System- An Ancient Educational System of India. International Journal of Applied Social Sciences. 2019; 6(6): 1620-1622.http://scientificresearchjournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/Social-Science-6_A-1620-1622-Full-Paper.pdf

35. Bhattacharjee, S. Indigenous Nature Conservation in Meghalaya: Environmental and Religious Dimensions of Tribal Land Ownership Among the Khasi Community. In: Biswas, D., Ryan, J.C. (eds) Environmental Humanities in India. Asia in Transition. 2025; 25. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-3933-2_5

36. Rawat, V. S., Rawat, Y. S., and Shah, S. Indigenous Knowledge and Sustainable Development in the Tones Valley of Garhwal Himalaya. Journal of Medicinal Plants Research. 2010; 4(19): 2043–2047. https://doi.org/10.5897/jmpr10.191

37. Acharya, S. Presage biology: Lessons from Nature in Weather Forecasting. Indian Journal of Traditional Knowledge. 2011; 10: 114-124. http://nopr.niscair.res.in/handle/123456789/11072

38. Rautela, Piyoosh and Karki, Bhavna. Weather Forecasting: Traditional Knowledge of the People of Uttarakhand Himalaya. Journal of Geography, Environment, and Earth Science International. 2015; 3: 1-14. DOI. 10.9734/JGEESI/2015/19016

39. Khan, Amir Ali. Earthquake Safe Traditional House Construction Practices in Kashmir. In Indigenous Knowledge for Disaster Risk Reduction: Good Practices and Lessons Learned from Experiences in the Asia-Pacific Region, edited by Rajib Shaw, Noralene Uy, and Jennifer Baumwoll. United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Reduction (UN/ISDR). 2018; 5-8. https://www.unisdr.org/files/3646_IndigenousKnowledgeDRR.pdf

40. Sharma, A. and M. Joshi. Indigenous Knowledge and Modern Science Give Environment-Friendly Shelter Solution in Flood-Affected Desert Region of India. Pp 9-14. In Indigenous Knowledge for Disaster Risk Reduction: Good Practices and Lessons Learned from Experiences in the Asia-Pacific Region, edited by Rajib Shaw, Noralene Uy, and Jennifer Baumwoll. United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Reduction (UN/ISDR). 2008; 9-13. https://www.unisdr.org/files/3646_IndigenousKnowledgeDRR.pdf

41. Singh, G. Mahatma Gandhi - A Sustainable Development Pioneer. EcoNews, 14^th Oct 2008. https://www.ecopreneurist.com/2008/10/14/mahatma-gandhi-who-first-envisioned-the-concept-of-sustainable-development/

42. Ibid.

Received on 09.03.2025 Revised on 19.05.2025

Accepted on 28.06.2025 Published on 07.11.2025

Available online from November 20, 2025

Res. J. of Humanities and Social Sciences. 2025;16(4):265-272.

DOI: 10.52711/2321-5828.2025.00044

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. Creative Commons License.